Archive for 'silly'

The Criminal Mastermind

I would like to introduce you to a nefarious criminal mastermind.  One that has been plaguing me for some time.

The criminal Mastermind plots her next heist

The Criminal Mastermind plots her next heist

Yes.  That’s right.  My cat.  The cat burgler, if you will.

What does she steal?  What she can.  Socks mostly.  Yes. Socks.

Its very serious.  Because I don’t have any socks, except the pair I am wearing right now!

How do I know it is her?  She has stolen socks before.  I found her stash once.  But she has since found a new one, that I cannot locate. And so…she waits. Waits until I buy new socks.  And then she will strike again.

I snarfed

These two comics almost made me spew coffee out my nose.

Force of Wil
Wil Power

Just thought I’d share.

Playmobil Security Checkpoint

I would like to point out what fun the comments for the Playmobile Security Checkpoint set at Amazon.com are:

Thank you Playmobil for allowing me to teach my 5-year old the importance of recognizing what a failing bureaucracy in a ever growing fascist state looks like.

There’s also this little functionality critique:

I was a little disappointed when I first bought this item, because the functionality is limited. My 5 year old son pointed out that the passenger’s shoes cannot be removed. Then, we placed a deadly fingernail file underneath the passenger’s scarf, and neither the detector doorway nor the security wand picked it up.

And some timely political statements:

Now that John McCain has decided that Water Boarding (that terrific technique invented by the Spanish Inquisition) is OK in some circumstances it should be added as an option to this Toy.

And:

While I’m sure your child will love this do we really want to reveal our security secrets to the terrorists? I bet al-Qaeda is training the next generation with this very product. I am saddened to learn that Playmobile hates America.

An entertaining read.

Thank You, Wil Wheaton!

Why am I thanking Wil Wheaton?

Its because Wil Wheaton invented the blog!

Wait, you didn’t know that?  Well, according this article, which helpfully introduces its readers to this strange blogging phenomenon, Wil Wheaton started the first blog:

As to history, most people attribute the first weblog to Wil Wheaton. Does that name sound familiar? He played Wesley Crusher, that sniveling, boy-genius ensign on Star Trek: The Next Generation. His blogs are quite interesting and often funny.

So, let us raise a glass to Wil Wheaton today and thank him for the creation of the blog. After all, without him, there would be no Livejournal, no Blogger.com, no Boingboing, and no (gasp) Grinningskull.com

/snark

Irony!

"I just can’t believe this. I can’t believe that they would allow children to be exposed to this kind of thing without warning!"

The above statement was spoken by a parent after viewing a movie trailer.

Can you guess which one?

If you said "Golden Compass" you’d be wrong.

This statement was made by a parent who took their child to see the Golden Compass, but became enraged when the trailer for Prince Caspian was shown before the film.

Am I a bad person for thinking this is funny?

What I find really amusing is that there isn’t a lot of overt Christianity in Prince Caspian.  The only Narnia book that really contains any overt Christian allegory is the Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe.  In the rest of the books, it doesn’t really come up.

And I’ve seen the trailer.  There’s nothing in it that references God or anything else.

I think everyone, from the Catholic League to the athiests, needs to drink a nice tall glass of STFU and relax a little.

ORLY?

“If Bill Clinton were a Republican, he would have resigned instead of sitting through the impeachment trial,” Hodges said. “We [Republicans] are the type of people that if we mess up, we step aside from the leadership role.”

The Skullphabet

Via BoingBoing, Skulladay presents the skullphabet.

Naturally, how could I resist?

Legally what? and Referendum

A video at TheStar.com has the following caption:

The screen grab is in case they change it. The text states:

Census data shows that for the first time legally unmarried couples out-number legally married partners, and couples without children are more common that couples with children.”

The bolded text is mine. I’m just curious what an illegally unmarried couple would be.

In other news, Ontario is having an election1. I’m torn. I’m a Liberal at heart, but I don’t feel that the current provincial leadership of the party is doing much of a job. Of course, on the other side, there’s John Tory, who (conveniently enough) is a Conservative2, who’s really good at saying what he would have done differently from the current Liberal government, but isn’t so good at saying what he will do. At least his advertisements don’t seem to concerned about saying about the future. I’m not even going to talk about the NDP in Ontario, because with the leadership they have right now, they aren’t even an issue. So, what’s the problem? I don’t feel like my conscience will let me vote liberal. There’s been too much disappointment there. Too many broken promises, and irresponsibility. However, I cannot bring myself to vote Conservative. I (like many others) was hurt badly by the so-called “Common Sense Revolution” and I won’t be a party to that happening again. As well, the Conservative Agenda is one that I cannot support.

Here’s something for party leaders to consider though. The city of Toronto was a prosperous city before Mike Harris buggered it. At one time, the now “mega-city” of Toronto was made up of a group of Municipalities that shared responsibility for certain services (Fire, Police, EMS & TTC, for example). Each city funded its own School Board, which was paid for out of property taxes. When Harris’ “Common Sense” dictated that the municipalities should be amalgamated into once “mega-city”, at the same time the funding of the school board was taken over by the province, while the costs of welfare was downloaded to the city (though control of the policies remained with the province). Suddenly, the city of Toronto was a huge monstrosity, and the cost of running it rose higher and higher (this is obviously a simplified recap), plunging the city into financial trouble.3 Now to the point: if there’s a provincial politician that will take some responsibility and help Toronto come up with a solution, I would vote for them. Hands down. No question. If there was a politician who was willing to say “I admit that amalgamation was simply an attempt by a conservative government to limit the voting influence of a Liberal-leaning city, with a powerful voter base, and downloading did no good and must be reversed”, that politician would have my vote. Right now, helping Toronto only seems to mean “Throwing money at Toronto” which is not the solution. Partially because it doesn’t fix anything, and partially because that just looks bad to the municipalities that aren’t Toronto. There needs to be a solution that fixes what ails the city.

So, here’s a challenge: is there a party that has the balls to solve a problem that was created by their predecessor? To roll back the mistake of amalgamation and reverse the downloading of Provincial services to the city? I’ll be surprised if there is. But I’m willing to be surprised. So, please: surprise me.

1. Hey Americans! Did you know Canadian elections only last for 4 weeks? I’ll be you’re jealous now!

2. The term Tory derives from the Tory Party, the ancestor of the modern UK Conservative Party. To this day it is often used as a shortened alternative for Conservative. A similar usage for Tory exists in Canada to describe the Conservative Party.

3. There are certain newspapers that will try to claim that the current trouble is the fault of the current municipal government. However, this is an out and out lie, since the same issues existed when there was a mayor in power that the certain paper liked. They just conveniently ignore that fact.

  Note: I don’t usually talk politics in this blog, but I really needed to make an exception here. For those who don’t agree with me, or those who hate politics, don’t worry… I’ll talk about something else soon enough.

I can has drink tiem now?

Inconceivable?

Apparently, Disney is suing people selling merchandise with the following line from the movie Dirty Dancing:

Nobody puts Baby in the corner.

They are suing for copyright infringement.

“You keep using that phrase.  I do not think it means what you think it means.”