An interesting week
This week has been an interesting one, from the world of Canadian politics to the spectre of the Net Neutrality debate once again raising its head, there has been a lot that I’ve meant to mention this week.
Unfortunately, between work and the Keystone Theatre workshop, I haven’t had a moment to blog about these things.
Sparked by announcements from the Tory finance minister, the Opposition parties threatened to bring down Stephen Harper’s government in a non-confidence vote, and propose rule via a Coalition government. Harper’s people immediately began a smear campaign regarding the whole thing, suggesting that the Coalition would not have legitimacy, since they weren’t voted into office, and that since the coalition included the Bloc, that it was tantamount to treason. Eventually, Harper went to the Governor General, and asked her to Prorogue parliament. This means that she would end the session. She agreed, and the Tories got their protection from a non-confidence vote.
This of course is the second time that Harper has avoided a non-confidence vote in parliament. The first is what sparked our last election. He doesn’t want to test the confidence of parliament, because he knows he doesn’t have it. Normally, this means that he doesn’t have a mandate to govern. If there are enough votes against the party to state that the House of Commons doesn’t have confidence in the government…that government is dissolved. That’s the way it works. Its part of the constitution.
So, when Harper suggests that the Opposition parties were not voted into office, and lack a mandate, he’s lying. He’s the one who lacks a mandate. His is the party in the minority in the house. Yes, the Tories hold the most seats, but the opposition parties outnumber them. That’s what a minority government is. A government in a minority needs to have the confidence of the house, or they lose their mandate to govern. Harper needs a refresher course in how the Parliamentary system works.
In other news, Michael Geist noted that Friday Dec. 5 was the deadline for written submissions to the CRTC’s New Media hearings. And I have to say that I’m a bit disappointed in a couple of organizations. Geist points out that ACTRA (the Candian film and tv actor’s union) is leading the call for a levy placed on ISP subscribers to “fund the creation of Canadian new media”. They also call for CANCON rules new media and wants the CRTC to licence new media undertaking, and think that user generated content should be regulated under the Broadcasting Act.
ACTRA is so completely wrong-headed on the issue of new media, that one wonders who is advising them. I’m not quite sure why they are trying to hinder New Media this way. I look at some of the success stories on the internet, from The Guild, to Dr. Horrible, to Ask a Ninja, to that guy singing a song on his webcam on youtube, are only possible with no licences. These things would not have been possible if those making them were required to be licenced and comply with the broadcast act.
ACTRA should revise this policy and come up with something that can encourage and assist their members in the creation of their own New Media, and help these members to use these creations to market themselves. And perhaps even make some money from them.
But ACTRA seems to be playing the role of the dinosaur here, rather than looking to the future.
Its quite sad.



Posts